O-I PACKAGING SOLUTIONS AND REVINO ROLL OUT RETURNABLE, REUSABLE GLASS WINE BOTTLES TO PACIFIC NORTHWEST

O-I Packaging Solutions (“O-IPS”), along with Revino, announce the introduction of returnable, reusable glass wine bottles to advance​ the​​ ​sustainability of wine packaging​, first rolling out in Oregon and extending soon to the west coast​​. O-IPS, a global manufacturer of sustainable glass packaging, will locally produce more than 2.4 million reusable glass wine bottles as part of Revino’s return system. Revino was founded to revive the reusable glass bottle ecosystem for beverage producers and consumers.

“Glass packaging for wine is made from pure and natural resources that are inert, infinitely recyclable and reliably preserve the integrity of the wine it packages,” said Randy Burns, Chief Sustainability and Corporate Affairs Officer for O-I Glass. “By extending the use phase of the glass packaging through return and refill winery partnerships, Revino is maximizing the sustainability of packaging for environmentally conscious wine producers.”

A 2020 study by Zero Waste Europe identified reusable packaging as the most environmentally friendly option. Revino with its end-to-end returnable glass bottle reuse system, built for the wine industry, seeks to create a more conscious mindset that encourages wineries and consumers to invest in more durable, and long-lasting, packaging for wine that will endure multiple use cycles.

​​On average, a reusable glass bottle can be reused 25-50 times before being retired and recycled into new glass packaging.
more at: https://investors.o-i.com/News-Events/news/news-details/2024/O-I-PACKAGING-SOLUTIONS-AND-REVINO-ROLL-OUT-RETURNABLE-REUSABLE-GLASS-WINE-BOTTLES-TO-PACIFIC-NORTHWEST/default.aspx

Related Posts

American Forest & Paper Association Releases May 2021 Packaging Papers Monthly Report

Total packaging papers & specialty packaging shipments in May increased five percent compared to May 2020. They were up two percent when compared to the same five months of 2020. The operating rate was 87.6 percent, up 7.3 points from May 2020 and up 5.6 points year-to-date. Mill inventories at the end of May decreased 2,000 short tons from the previous month and were up 3,000 short tons compared to May 2020.

Metsä Board’s comparable operating result in 2021 was EUR 387 million

January–December 2021 (compared to 1–12/2020) • Sales were EUR 2,084.1 million (1,889.5). • Comparable operating result was EUR 386.6 million (221.2), or 18.6% (11.7) of sales. Operating result was EUR 375.9 million (227.3). • Comparable earnings per share were EUR 0.85 (0.46), and earnings per share were EUR 0.82 (0.48). • Comparable return on capital employed was EUR 18.7% (12.2). • Net cash flow from operations was EUR 329.6 million (307.7). October–December 2021 (compared to 10–12/2020) • Sales were EUR 518.5 million (473.1). • Comparable operating result was EUR 91.3 million (64.5), or 17.6% (13.6) of sales. Operating result was EUR 90.8 million (64.5). • Comparable earnings per share were EUR 0.20 (0.14), and earnings per share were EUR 0.19 (0.14). • Comparable return on capital employed was 16.1% (14.3). • Net cash flow from operations was EUR 119.7 million (81.0).

Is Paper A More Sustainable Flexible Packaging Material Than Plastic? (Forbes.com)

Like many other major plastics applications, plastics use in flexible packaging has come under deep scrutiny in recent years as sustainability concerns rise and spread globally. Paper is often lauded as a far more environmentally friendly alternative but how do the two materials really compare? And what is the most sustainable solution? Historically, papers have been used in flexible packaging for many applications, including confectionery, pet food and dried food. By the early-2000s, however, paper demand as a flexible packaging substrate began to decline due to competition from down-gauging and the rise of plastic alternatives. Consumers today widely view paper as a more environmentally friendly alternative to plastic. A European consumer preferences survey, commissioned by Two Sides in 2020, concluded that 62% of consumers see paper and cardboard packaging as better for the environment. Additionally, 70% of consumers surveyed said they were actively taking steps to reduce their use of plastic packaging. Comparing green credentials isn’t as straightforward as some would think, however.
Back To Top
×Close search
Search