High-performing Single-stream Recycling Systems Recover More Recyclable Materials than Mixed-waste Processing

An economic and policy study commissioned by the American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA) and developed by engineering firm Burns & McDonnell shows that high-performing single-stream recycling systems recover more paper and other recyclable materials than mixed-waste facilities that combine wet and organic waste with dry recyclables.

Mixed-waste processing recovers much less mill-quality paper, but more metal and plastic, and requires 2.5 times the facility capital cost of single-stream recycling.

The full study is available at www.afandpa.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/final_mixed-waste-processing-economic-and-policy-study.pdf.

“Paper recovery is the economic foundation for many successful community recycling programs,” said AF&PA Executive Director of Recovered Fiber Brian Hawkinson. “Every situation is unique and there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution. The size of a community, its recycling rate, goals for materials recovery, markets for recovered materials, landfill disposal costs and other factors all impact the economics of any recycling system.”

AF&PA conducted the study to help communities better understand whether mixed-waste processing could assist them with meeting their recycling goals. As the composition of the waste stream continues to change and communities’ interest in diversion evolves, seeking cost-effective options to increase overall recycling rates is a challenge.

Recognizing that multiple technical, economic and environmental questions exist concerning the feasibility of mixed-waste processing, the study focused on recovering recyclable materials from residential sources and assessed several scenarios comparing mixed-waste processing to single-stream recycling in a representative large U.S. city.

The U.S. paper and paperboard manufacturing industry relies on a continuing, expanding supply of mill-quality recovered paper fiber from community single-stream recycling systems for feedstock to manufacture new products. In a mixed-waste system, clean, dry recyclable paper is mixed with wet and organic waste, which increases the potential for contamination of the fiber and, thus, limits its availability and viability for reuse in manufacturing new paper and paperboard products.

The industry has set a goal to exceed 70 percent paper recovery by 2020 as part of its Better Practices, Better Planet 2020 sustainability initiative. Paper recovery for recycling helps extend the useful life of paper and paper-based packaging products, making it an integral part of the industry’s sustainability story.
http://afandpa.org/media/news/2015/10/22/high-performing-single-stream-recycling-systems-recover-more-recyclable-materials-than-mixed-waste-processing

Related Posts

Join us (PEFC) online as we explain the changes to our standard setting requirements

Do you want to give your feedback as we revise our standard setting process? But feel like you need more information on how our standard is changing? Then make sure you register for our upcoming webinars! Taking place this Thursday 11 and Friday 12 May, these webinars will introduce and explain the main changes to PEFC ST 1001 – the standard governing our standard setting requirements. There will also be an open question and answer session – make sure you register now so you don’t miss out. click Read More below for additional detail

Public consultations – Shape the FSC system!

The documents and changes being consulted on are: **Standard to define small and low-intensity forests to now include community forest FSC-STD-01-003 SLIMF & Community Forest Eligibility Criteria sets a generic threshold and definition for ‘SLIMF’ and ‘community forest.’ SLIMF and community forest thresholds are then able to be adapted to the national context. The main changes being consulted on include: *New definition for ‘community forest’ *Adding flexibility to national standard developers, even allowing for the threshold for SLIMF to be over 1000 hectares once there is justification in addition to stakeholder support provided. The consultation ends 13 June 2022. Learn more about the process here. Click read more below for details

Sustainability success for Flint Group with improved EcoVadis rating

Leading global print consumables manufacturer, Flint Group, is celebrating continual improvement after its updated EcoVadis rating, which saw a seven-point increase over 2022. EcoVadis’ scoring takes an evidence-based approach to measuring the supply chain sustainability efforts of a given business. Flint Group has improved its Silver Level rating overall to 65 – raising up from 58, marking it as a business making significant sustainability advances. A key driver for the improved score is the considerable rise in the company’s Environmental category score from 50 to 70 points. Steve Dryden, CEO of Flint Group, comments: “We are delighted to announce a seven-point increase to our EcoVadis score. The new score shows that our efforts are making an important difference and provides groundwork and direction for further improvement. As a business that leads the way in high-performance inks and coatings designed for circular economies, our actions must match our intentions for a more sustainable supply chain.”
Back To Top
×Close search
Search