FSC Approves Supplementary Requirements for Forest Service Lands

For the first time, FSC certification is now an option for National Forests, after the final approval in March 2019 of the supplementary requirements to the FSC US Forest Management Standard. These requirements have been incorporated into an updated version of the Standard which is available on the FSC US web site.

Should a National Forest choose to pursue FSC certification, the process would apply both the regular FSC Forest Management Standard and the newly approved supplementary requirements. These additional requirements recognize the unique role of National Forests in the United States, holding forest management on these lands to a higher level of expectations.

The supplementary requirements include an emphasis on ecological integrity, including both restoration and maintenance of ecosystems; extra protections for forest workers, including workers employed by contractors; additional requirements associated with carbon stocks, climate change and wildfire; extra requirements for assessing the landscape of the National Forest, including both the federal and non-federal lands; additional requirements associated with infrastructure, such as roads, road-crossings, and culverts; and higher expectations for consultations, including those with the public and tribes that have rights within the forest area.

The process to develop the supplementary requirements followed FSC normative procedures, including input and oversight by a chamber-balanced and consensus-based working group and technical experts, and opportunities for broad stakeholder engagement. The supplementary requirements and associated procedures for certification bodies were taken through three rounds of public consultation prior to being approved by FSC.
https://us.fsc.org/en-us/newsroom/newsletter/id/1080

Related Posts

We believe that the value of packaging is more than its impact on the planet (huhtamaki.com)

Packaging has a fundamental role in building sustainable, safe, and hygienic food systems globally. We believe that the value of packaging is more than its impact on the planet. But just as with all innovations, there are challenges to be dealt with. Water, a limited yet critical resource for both natural ecosystems and human survival, is becoming increasingly scarce. Our increasing use of this natural element, which ranges from personal consumption to agricultural and industrial applications, has led to global water demand increasing at twice the rate of population growth over the past 100 years.i Whilst climate change is an important driver of geographic water shortages across the globe, an expanding population and rapid economic development have a more immediate impact on current water levels globally. According to the EU’s Joint Research Center, approximately two-thirds of the world’s population – half of whom reside in India and China – experience severe water scarcity for at least one month per year. In Europe, more than 120 million citizens lack access to safe drinking water and half a billion people across the globe face critical shortages annually. In a study of 71 cities with more than 750,000 inhabitants, it is estimated that 35 per cent are vulnerable to water scarcity at present.ii

AF&PA Supports NY Legislature’s Decision to Shelve and Improve EPR Proposal

This weekend, the New York State Legislature concluded its session without passing the Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act. While the American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA) supports efforts to improve recycling, the legislation lacked provisions to ensure it would not negatively impact highly recycled materials like paper and paper-based packaging. We look forward to continuing discussions that ensure paper-based packaging recycling remains a viable and sustainable option for New Yorkers.

65 North American Companies Remove “Go Paperless – Go Green” Claims

Two Sides North America, Inc. confirmed that over 65 leading North American companies have removed inaccurate anti-paper claims as a result of the group’s efforts. The list includes several Fortune 100 companies in the financial, telecom and utilities sectors who have engaged in a dialogue with Two Sides and modified their marketing messages to consider the social and environmental benefits of print and paper, as well as the life cycle of sustainable forests and paper products. “The ‘go green and save trees’ claims are misleading and false for many reasons, and they are a form of greenwashing that needs to be corrected,” said Phil Riebel, President of Two Sides North America, Inc. “The claims don’t consider the renewability of paper, or the numerous social, environmental, and economic benefits of well-managed North American forests, which in the U.S. have grown by 58% in wood volume over the past 60 years.” click Read More below for the rest of the story
Back To Top
×Close search
Search