Crutchfield sues to block Massachusetts from collecting online sales tax

The electronics retailer, which has no physical presence in Massachusetts, says the state’s demand that it collect and remit tax from online sales there is unconstitutional.

Massachusetts officials want Crutchfield Corp. to fork over sales taxes for online transactions made their state, and the Virginia-based consumer electronics retailer is going to court over the request.

Crutchfield, No. 190 in the Internet Retailer 2017 Top 500, on Tuesday filed a complaint in a Virginia court seeking a declaratory judgment to exempt it from Massachusetts’ efforts to collect sales tax for online transactions, despite the fact that Crutchfield has no physical presence there.

The retailer maintains that Massachusetts’ attempt to collect sales tax violates federal law, as determined by a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision in a case generally known as Quill Corp. v. North Dakota. The court in that case ruled that Quill, a catalog retailer, did not have to collect sales tax in North Dakota where it had no physical presence. Online retailers have used that decision to argue that they need not collect sales tax in states where they do not have physical locations.

“The physical presence requirement of Quill currently remains the law of the land under the U.S. Constitution. The states, and all state agencies, including the commissioner and the MDOR [Massachusetts Department of Revenue], are bound by Quill,” Crutchfield states in the lawsuit.

Crutchfield filed its action in Virginia because the commonwealth has a law that allows Virginia businesses to sue for declaratory judgement against a state that asserts a sales tax obligation when the business has no physical presence.

The Massachusetts Department of Revenue had informed Crutchfield that, by Oct. 1, it must register with the state as an internet vendor because it had more than $500,000 in online sales and more than 100 transactions resulting in delivery to Massachusetts in the preceding 12 months. An online retailer meeting those criteria is obligated to register for, collect and remit Massachusetts sales and use tax, according the department of revenue. Businesses that don’t comply face statutory penalties and interest charges.
more at:  https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/2017/10/25/crutchfield-sues-block-massachusetts-collecting-online-sales-tax/

Related Posts

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Postal Service Reform Bill; Would Minimize Rate Increases for Now

"The Postal Reform Act of 2018: Improving Postal Operations, Service, and Transparency" was introduced in the U.S. Senate yesterday as a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Senators Tom Carper (D-Del.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.). If passed, the legislation would make sweeping changes to current rules and regulations that have led, in large part, to the dire long-term financial situation of the U.S. Postal Service, including 11 straight years of net losses and a net loss for its first quarter totaling $540 million - despite the USPS setting a record on Dec. 18, 2017, when more than 37 million packages were delivered, the most packages delivered in a single day in its more than 200-year history.

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy Remarks to National Association of Secretaries of State (as prepared for delivery)

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy delivered the following remarks today to the National Association of Secretaries of State in a conference call regarding ongoing election preparations: “Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for the opportunity to join you today. We are less than seven weeks from Election Day. The Postal Service is ready and committed to handle whatever volume of election mail it receives. Our number one priority is to deliver election mail on-time and within the Postal Service’s well-established standards. Let me underscore that the Postal Service has more than enough capacity, including collection boxes and processing equipment, to handle all election mail this year, which is predicted to amount to less than 2% of total mail volume from mid-September to Election Day. In terms of the recent mailer, as you know the intent of our nationwide mailer was to craft one common message to encourage voters to inform themselves on how to vote by mail effectively, and to avoid providing guidance on state-specific rules and regulations. The concern that some of you have voiced about the mailer underscores why we set out to create one message and not state-specific guidance. I should note, several of you have also voiced appreciation about our educational effort to the public."

April Bookstore Sales Skyrocketed (publishersweekly.com)

Rebounding from the worst month of the 2020 sales collapse, April bookstore sales soared 204% over last year, jumping to $514 million, from $169 million in April 2020. Despite the huge improvement, April bookstore sales were still 21% below sales in April 2019. The increase in bookstore sales was in keeping with the improvement in the retail sector in general in April, which had a 53.5% sales increase in the month.
Back To Top
×Close search
Search